Nexus SecOps Reference Architecture¶
This document defines the reference architecture for an AI-Powered Security Operations Center. It describes the technology layers, their relationships, and design principles that underpin the Nexus SecOps benchmark.
Architecture Overview¶
flowchart TD
subgraph SOURCES["Log Sources"]
EP[Endpoints\nEDR / AV]
NET[Network\nFirewall / NDR / DNS]
ID[Identity\nIdP / AD / SSO]
CLD[Cloud\nAWS / Azure / GCP]
APP[Applications\nWeb / API / Email]
OT[OT/ICS\nSensors via Diode]
end
subgraph COLLECT["Collection Layer"]
AGT[Agents\n& Forwarders]
API[API Collectors\n& Connectors]
SYS[Syslog Receivers]
BUF[Message Buffer\nKafka / Queue]
end
subgraph STORE["Storage and Processing"]
SIEM[SIEM\nRule Engine + Correlation]
DL[Data Lake\nLong-term + ML]
HOT[Hot Storage\n0-90 days]
WARM[Warm Storage\n90d-1yr]
COLD[Cold Archive\n1yr+]
end
subgraph INTEL["Intelligence Layer"]
TIP[Threat Intel\nPlatform]
FEEDS[External Feeds\nISAC / OSINT]
ENRICH[Enrichment\nGeo / ASN / CMDB]
end
subgraph DETECT["Detection Layer"]
RULES[Rule Engine\nSigma / Native]
ML[ML Models\nUEBA / Anomaly]
CORR[Correlation\nMulti-event]
end
subgraph AUTO["Automation Layer"]
SOAR[SOAR Platform]
PB[Playbooks]
GATE[Human Gates\nApproval Workflow]
end
subgraph PRESENT["Presentation Layer"]
CASE[Case Management]
DASH[SOC Dashboard]
RPT[Reporting]
end
subgraph AI["AI Assistance Layer"]
LLM[LLM Copilot]
RAG[RAG Knowledge Base\nRunbooks / TI / History]
end
SOURCES --> COLLECT
COLLECT --> BUF
BUF --> STORE
FEEDS --> TIP
TIP --> INTEL
ENRICH --> INTEL
INTEL --> DETECT
STORE --> DETECT
DETECT --> AUTO
AUTO --> PRESENT
INTEL -.->|Contextual enrichment| PRESENT
RAG --> LLM
LLM -.->|Analyst assistance| PRESENT Layer Descriptions¶
Collection Layer¶
Purpose: Reliably transport log data from sources to the storage and processing layer with minimal loss and latency.
Components:
| Component | Role | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Agents/Forwarders | Installed on endpoints/servers; collect and forward logs | Elastic Agent, Splunk UF, Filebeat |
| API Collectors | Pull logs from cloud services and SaaS via API | Custom scripts, Logstash, vendor connectors |
| Syslog Receivers | Receive network device logs via UDP/TCP syslog | rsyslog, syslog-ng |
| Message Buffer | Decouple source from storage; absorb volume spikes | Apache Kafka, Azure Event Hub, AWS Kinesis |
Design principles: - Encrypt all transport (TLS 1.2+) — Nexus SecOps-003 - Buffer to prevent data loss during SIEM maintenance — Nexus SecOps-002 - Monitor delivery health; alert on gaps — Nexus SecOps-007 - Deploy agents at ≥98% coverage for managed endpoints — Nexus SecOps-006
Storage Layer¶
Purpose: Retain security logs in queryable form for detection and investigation, and in archived form for compliance.
Tiered Storage Model:
| Tier | Retention | Access Speed | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hot (SIEM) | 0–90 days | Real-time | Active detection, live investigation |
| Warm (Data Lake) | 90 days–1 year | Minutes | Threat hunting, historical investigation |
| Cold (Archive) | 1 year+ | Hours | Compliance, legal, forensics |
SIEM vs. Data Lake:
| SIEM | Data Lake | |
|---|---|---|
| Optimized for | Real-time correlation, alerting | Large-scale search, ML, long-term |
| Schema | Rigid, pre-parsed | Flexible, schema-on-read |
| Cost per GB | High | Low |
| Latency | Sub-second | Seconds to minutes |
| ML workloads | Limited | Native |
Use a hybrid architecture: SIEM for real-time alerting (hot data), data lake for threat hunting, ML training, and retention (warm/cold data).
Intelligence Layer¶
Purpose: Enrich security events with contextual data that transforms raw logs into actionable intelligence.
Enrichment types:
| Enrichment | What It Adds | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Asset context | Host criticality, owner, OS, business unit | CMDB / Asset inventory |
| User context | Role, department, admin status, manager | Active Directory / HR system |
| IP reputation | Malicious/benign score, geo, ASN | Threat intelligence feeds, VirusTotal |
| File reputation | Known malware, file metadata | Threat intelligence feeds |
| IOC matching | Confirmed threat indicators | SIEM IOC matching, TIP |
Nexus SecOps controls: Nexus SecOps-018 (asset enrichment), Nexus SecOps-019 (IP enrichment), Nexus SecOps-026 (TI enrichment), Nexus SecOps-081–095 (CTI domain)
Detection Layer¶
Purpose: Identify threat behavior in log data through rules, correlation, and machine learning.
Detection engine types:
| Type | Mechanism | Best For | Nexus SecOps Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature/rule | Pattern matching on field values | Known attack patterns | Nexus SecOps-031, 032 |
| Threshold | Count-based triggers | Brute force, scanning | Nexus SecOps-031 |
| Correlation | Multi-event sequences across time | Attack chains | Nexus SecOps-046 |
| Statistical anomaly | Deviation from baseline | Unknown threats, UEBA | Nexus SecOps-044, 169 |
| ML classification | Trained model scores events | Complex behavioral patterns | Nexus SecOps-050 |
Detection content governance: All rules MUST follow the detection change control process (Nexus SecOps-033, Nexus SecOps-203). Rules are version-controlled in a git repository.
Automation Layer¶
Purpose: Accelerate response actions, reduce manual workload, and enforce consistent processes through SOAR playbooks.
Key design principles: - All high-impact actions (account disable, host isolation) MUST have human approval gates — Nexus SecOps-099 - Playbooks MUST be version-controlled and tested before deployment — Nexus SecOps-098, 100 - All automation actions MUST be logged with full audit trail — Nexus SecOps-102 - Rollback procedures MUST exist for all automated actions — Nexus SecOps-103
Automation tiers:
| Tier | Actions | Human Gate? |
|---|---|---|
| Enrichment | IP lookup, asset lookup, user context | No |
| Notification | Create ticket, send alert, assign to analyst | No |
| Soft containment | Revoke session, disable alert source | No |
| Hard containment | Disable account, isolate host, block IP | Yes — required |
Presentation Layer¶
Purpose: Surface actionable intelligence to analysts in the right format at the right time.
Components:
| Component | Audience | Key Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Alert queue dashboard | Tier 1 analysts | Queue depth, SLA status, open by severity |
| Investigation workbench | Tier 2 analysts | Timeline view, entity relationships, pivot tools |
| Case management | Tier 2 / IR leads | Incident timeline, evidence log, action tracker |
| Operational dashboard | SOC Manager | MTTD, MTTR, FP rate, SLA compliance |
| Executive dashboard | CISO / Board | Dwell time, critical incidents, risk posture |
AI Assistance Layer¶
Purpose: Augment analyst productivity through LLM-powered copilots grounded in authoritative security knowledge.
Architecture:
flowchart LR
Q[Analyst Query] --> EMB[Query Embedding]
EMB --> VS[Vector Search]
VS --> KB[(Knowledge Base\nRunbooks / TI Reports\nPlaybooks / History)]
KB --> CTX[Retrieved Context]
CTX --> PROMPT[Augmented Prompt]
Q --> PROMPT
PROMPT --> LLM[LLM API]
LLM --> OUT[Response + Citations]
OUT --> ANALYST[Analyst Review] Key requirements: - All LLM deployments inventoried — Nexus SecOps-181 - Prompt injection defense implemented — Nexus SecOps-182 - RAG grounding for factual queries — Nexus SecOps-184 - PII filtered before external API submission — Nexus SecOps-186 - Human review required before acting on LLM output — Nexus SecOps-191
High Availability Design¶
Single points of failure to eliminate:
| Component | HA Approach |
|---|---|
| SIEM platform | Active-active clustering or hot standby |
| Log collection buffer | Multi-broker Kafka cluster; replication factor ≥ 3 |
| SOAR platform | Active-passive with automated failover |
| Log agents | Agent-level buffer to disk; retry on connection failure |
| TIP/enrichment APIs | Circuit breaker pattern; graceful degradation if API down |
Nexus SecOps-007 requires alerting when log delivery stops. Monitor the monitoring infrastructure itself with an independent health check.
Security of the SOC Infrastructure¶
The SOC tools themselves are high-value targets. Apply these controls:
| Risk | Control |
|---|---|
| Unauthorized SIEM access | MFA + RBAC; analysts see only authorized data — Nexus SecOps-114 |
| SOAR credential theft | Vault-based credential management; no hardcoded API keys — Nexus SecOps-104 |
| Log tampering | Write-once log storage; integrity hashing — Nexus SecOps-005 |
| Lateral movement to SIEM | Network segmentation; SOC tools in dedicated VLAN — Nexus SecOps-121 |
| Supply chain attack on SIEM | Vendor security assessment; software integrity verification |
| LLM data leakage | PII filtering; on-premises LLM for sensitive data — Nexus SecOps-186, 196 |
Technology Selection Criteria¶
| Layer | Key Selection Criteria |
|---|---|
| SIEM | Real-time query performance; rule language; native integrations; license model |
| Data Lake | Cost per TB; query language (SQL/KQL/SPL); ML integration; retention flexibility |
| EDR | Coverage (Windows/Linux/Mac/cloud); behavioral detection; isolation capability |
| SOAR | Integration catalog breadth; human gate support; playbook versioning; audit log |
| TIP | Feed quality; STIX/TAXII support; SIEM integration; indicator TTL management |
| LLM Copilot | Grounding capability; PII controls; on-premises option; evaluation framework |
See Data Pipeline Patterns | Integration Patterns | Zero Trust SOC Nexus SecOps controls: All 14 domains apply to this architecture.